It's the Oil
Never mind the pundits, the root cause remains the same
by Johnny Angel
In the orgy of examination of who and what is to blame for the events
of September 11, we must have heard every conceivable explanation. The American right, as
exemplified by President Bush, Fox News and the opinion page of the The Wall Street
Journal, blames envy of American values and success. The extreme right blames secular
humanism, gay rights and the other bogeymen they love to flog. The center faults lax
airport security and a general lack of preparedness, while the left, all but ignored by
the corporate media, blames American imperialism and in some cases our unconditional
support for Israel.
Yet for all the noise generated by partisans and centrists alike, no one is willing to
accept the blatantly obvious, the real underlying factor behind America's involvement in
the byzantine labyrinth of Middle East politics. What could possibly motivate the propping
up of repressive non-democracies like the Saudi and Kuwaiti royal families, or murderous
regimes like that of Reza Pahlavi, Shah of Iran? Or pouring billions into the coffers of
Saddam Hussein in the '80s, or even creating the monster that is possibly the mastermind
of these attacks, Osama bin Laden, beneficiary of CIA lucre and training?
It's the oil, stupid.
Once again, America's twin addictions, that of its people to cheap gasoline and its
corporations to billions of petro-dollars, has led us right into the proverbial pit.
Having learned very little or forgotten a lot in the wake of the oil embargoes of the
1970s, America is as strung out on the fossil-fuel jones as any Bonnie Brae Street junkie
is on Mexican tar heroin. Even though American dependency on oil from the Middle East has
fallen to about 17 percent of national consumption, Saudi Arabia remains the cornerstone,
producing 50 percent of the whole world's supply. So in order to keep this economic balm
flowing, to keep the status quo static and the balance sheets of the major oil companies
brimming, we've installed our military as a kind of mega police force in the region. Our
official reason for being there is to ensure "stability," one of the great
buzzwords in the history of business, but this is nothing more than spin - the military is
in the Middle East to guarantee that whatever comes out of the ground is exploitable and
controlled by American multinationals.
And it is the simple fact of the presence of American soldiers on the holy soil of Islam
that has so enraged our new nemesis, bin Laden.
Speaking to British journalist Robert Fisk in 1996 Afghanistan, bin Laden made clear his
agenda. "When the American troops entered Saudia Arabia [after Iraq's invasion of
Kuwait], the land of the two holy places [Mecca and Medina], there was strong protest from
the ulema [religious authorities] and from students of the Shariah law all over the
country against the interference of American troops," bin Laden told Fisk, who
published the comments in The Nation in 1998. The Saudi leaders made a "big
mistake," bin Laden said, when they responded by suppressing the protests and
cementing ties to the U.S. "After it had insulted and jailed the ulema . . . the
Saudi regime lost its legitimacy," bin Laden said. And so began his deadly fatwa
against the United States.
Oil has been the prime mover behind any and every political decision in that region since
the First World War, when trucks, tanks and planes replaced horses and camels. Once the
internal-combustion engine became the technological centerpiece of the century, keeping it
going by any means necessary became a most profitable business venture. And despite the
myth that has been rammed down America's psyche for eons, American business loathes
competition and aims for monopoly. Sure, they'll partner with the Saudi royal family
(because the government that they dominate owns all of its oil), but in exchange, anyone
in the region who actually believes in the rights of the people of that country to share
in the wealth of their homeland is shut out. And forcefully, with the aid of the American
military and CIA, as we saw in Iran and during the Gulf War.
This dusty, empty part of the world was basically nothing more than a bedouin crossroads
for 1,300 years, between the end of the Crusades and the early 1900s. During the period
when America endured revolution and a civil war, and Europe tore itself apart, the Middle
East was downright peaceful. Tell me why the United States and Great Britain reflexively
back the state of Israel in its battles with its neighbors. Were it not sitting
strategically close to vast pools of viscous crude, no one would give a rat's ass about
either side.
It's the meddling in the internal affairs of the indigenous people of the region to ensure
that said oil stays in the hands of the privileged few that has led to an enraged
underground movement of terrorists in these lands. And oil is all we're there for - what
else of value comes from that part of the world, what strategic value does it have
otherwise?
That may seem as obvious as the nose on our collective face, but it's something no one
wants to acknowledge. Especially given the ties between the media and the oil companies:
ABC is tied to Texaco, NBC to British Petroleum, Time Warner to Mobil Oil, as revealed in
the marvelous media-watchdog flier Censored Alert in the summer of 2000. And now the oil
industry is entrenched as America's No. 1 player with Bush and Cheney, two oil men (one
failed, one successful) in command.
Eliminate the oil, and the American presence ends in the area; the resentment aimed at our
land and our people also ends. Out of sight, out of mind, remember? Never mind the
bollocks about how the Arabs envy our wealth: I don't see them terrorizing Monaco or
flying jets into the side of the Big Ben. The simple fact is, our armies piss them off as
colonial enforcers. Much in the same way that our forefathers loathed Hessians in the
American Revolution.
If anything, the leaders of the Middle East are terrified of our abandonment. Like savvy
survivors, they play both sides at the same time. Just as an American corporation will
donate money to Republicans and Democrats both, so these strongmen pay lip service to
America while nodding, winking and (in the case of Yemen and allegedly some Saudi
businessmen) donating money to terrorist cells on the side, just to be safe.
It's our own greed and need for control that has led us into this petroleum quagmire. Ross
Perot, hardly the voice of progressive politics, made the canny observation in the first
presidential debate of 1992 that the Gulf War was fought solely for control of oil and
nothing more. He made the further point that American blood wasn't worth shedding over a
product that Saddam would have been glad to sell us himself.
Too late for that sort of pragmatism. The war we're about to wage will surely be
protracted and costly, with profound repercussions, and all because we decided that
dealing with our enslavement to gasoline via conservation, alternative energy sources and
the like was just too incon-fucking-venient. Feel that way now?